state liability
noun · Staatshaftung / Amtshaftung
State liability for wrongful official conduct is Staatshaftung, and its core claim is Amtshaftung, § 839 BGB with Art. 34 GG. § 839 states the personal liability of the official for a culpable breach of a third-protecting official duty; Art. 34 GG transfers that liability to the state, and opens the ordinary courts.
Which translation, when
Why
State liability is Staatshaftung, and the claim that carries most cases is the Amtshaftungsanspruch of § 839 BGB together with Art. 34 GG, so a translation should render the field but keep its mechanism straight. By its wording § 839 BGB makes the official personally liable for a culpable breach of an official duty owed to a third party; standing alone that would be a private tort of the official. Art. 34 Satz 1 GG then steps in and transfers the liability to the state or other public body in whose service the official acted, so that towards the injured party the state answers, not the official, who can be taken into recourse only for intent or gross negligence, Art. 34 Satz 2 GG. The claim requires the breach of a third-protecting official duty, committed in the exercise of a public office and not merely on its occasion, with fault and causation, and official is read widely, covering anyone entrusted with public authority rather than only career civil servants. A counter-intuitive point that a translation must preserve is the forum: even though the claim is grounded in public law, Art. 34 Satz 3 GG sends disputes about it to the ordinary civil courts, not the administrative courts. Beyond Amtshaftung the field is unsystematic, since a general Staatshaftungsgesetz was struck down, and the judge-made claims for expropriatory and equivalent interference sit alongside it. So the words name a state liability built out of a private-law norm and a constitutional transfer, tried before the ordinary courts.
Typical mistakes
- Under Art. 34 Satz 1 GG the state, not the official personally, answers to the injured party, so rendering state liability as the official’s own liability inverts the mechanism.
- The compensation claim goes to the ordinary civil courts, Art. 34 Satz 3 GG, not the administrative courts, so assuming the administrative-court route is wrong.
- The claim needs a third-protecting official duty and fault, § 839 BGB, so treating it as strict or as protecting only the general public overstates or understates it.
What matters
Rendering a claim against the state for wrongful official conduct, the translation should use Staatshaftung for the field and Amtshaftung for the § 839 BGB and Art. 34 GG claim, mark that Art. 34 transfers the official’s liability to the state, and note that disputes go to the ordinary civil courts, not the administrative courts.
What the machine misses
Machine output renders state liability as Staatshaftung but may present it as the official’s personal liability and lose the Art. 34 GG transfer to the state. It also tends to drop that the claim runs through § 839 BGB, needs a third-protecting official duty and fault, and goes to the ordinary civil courts rather than the administrative courts. The rendering can misplace both who is liable and which court decides.
Examples
| a state liability claim | ein Amtshaftungsanspruch |
| liability for breach of official duty | Haftung für Amtspflichtverletzung |
| the state is liable | der Staat haftet |
| the ordinary courts have jurisdiction | die ordentlichen Gerichte sind zuständig |