engagement
noun · Verlöbnis
Verlöbnis is the right word, and it is more than the social state English suggests. You still cannot sue to force the marriage, § 1297 BGB, but breaking it off can cost damages, § 1298 BGB, and the engagement gifts can be reclaimed if the wedding does not happen, § 1301 BGB.
Which translation, when
Why
Engagement maps to Verlöbnis, and the surprise runs against the usual direction: German treats the engagement as more legally loaded than the English word implies. The prevailing view calls the Verlöbnis a contract directed at marriage, yet its central rule is negative: under § 1297 BGB no application to compel the marriage can be founded on it, and any promise of a penalty for not marrying is void. What the Verlöbnis does carry are consequences on breaking it off. Under § 1298 BGB the party who withdraws without good cause owes the other the outlay made in expectation of the marriage, the Vertrauensschaden, so far as it was reasonable, and § 1299 extends this where the withdrawal was provoked by the other’s fault. Under § 1301 BGB, if the marriage does not take place, each may reclaim what was given as an engagement gift under the rules on unjust enrichment. There is even a testimony privilege for the Verlobte in court. English law went the other way: the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1970 abolished the action for breach of promise of marriage, leaving little beyond the return of the ring. So the word is safe, but a translation that treats a broken German Verlöbnis as legally weightless misses the damages and gift claims that § 1298 and § 1301 attach to it.
Typical mistakes
- The Verlöbnis is not merely social: breaking it off without good cause can found a damages claim for reasonable outlay made in expectation of the marriage, § 1298 BGB, so treating it as weightless understates the position.
- Engagement gifts can be reclaimed if the marriage does not happen, § 1301 BGB, under the rules on unjust enrichment, which an English reader assuming the ring is simply kept may miss.
- Even so, no one can be forced to marry: § 1297 BGB bars any application to compel the marriage and voids a penalty promise, so a clause purporting to enforce the engagement is ineffective.
What matters
Correspondence after a broken engagement needs the German effects kept in view, because a withdrawal without good cause can carry a claim for wasted wedding expenses, § 1298 BGB, and the return of engagement gifts, § 1301 BGB. A drafting request to make an engagement binding runs into § 1297 BGB, which bars compelling the marriage and voids any penalty for calling it off.
What the machine misses
Engagement is rendered Verlöbnis, and the word is correct while the legal weight is dropped. A machine carries the English assumption that an engagement is a purely social matter, and German law attaches consequences to breaking it off: damages for reasonable wedding outlay, § 1298 BGB, and the return of engagement gifts, § 1301 BGB. It also leaves the impression that the engagement might be enforceable, when § 1297 BGB bars any move to compel the marriage.
Examples
| to break off the engagement | das Verlöbnis lösen |
| the engaged couple | die Verlobten |
| damages for breaking off the engagement | Schadensersatz wegen Rücktritts vom Verlöbnis |
| to return the engagement gifts | die Verlobungsgeschenke zurückgeben |