Charter
noun · Grundrechtecharta
In Union law the Charter is the Charter of Fundamental Rights, the Grundrechtecharta, which since Lisbon has the same legal value as the Treaties, Art. 6 Abs. 1 EUV. It binds the Member States only when they are implementing Union law, Art. 51 Abs. 1 GRCh, not across all national law, and it is not the ECHR or the European Social Charter.
Which translation, when
Why
In a Union-law text the Charter is the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, the Grundrechtecharta, and two points decide how far it reaches. First, status: since the Treaty of Lisbon the Charter has the same legal value as the Treaties, Art. 6 Abs. 1 EUV, so it is primary Union law. Second, scope, which is the trap. By Art. 51 Abs. 1 GRCh the Charter is addressed to the institutions of the Union and to the Member States only when they are implementing Union law; it does not, Art. 51 Abs. 2 GRCh, extend the field of Union law or create new competences. So the Charter is not a general national bill of rights standing alongside the Grundgesetz for all purposes; whether a Charter right can be invoked against a national measure turns on whether that measure falls within the scope of Union law, which the Court of Justice in Åkerberg Fransson aligned with the Charter’s own field of application. It must also be kept apart from neighbouring instruments: the European Convention on Human Rights, the EMRK, belongs to the Council of Europe and is a Konvention, and the European Social Charter, the Europäische Sozialcharta, is a different treaty again. A bare Charta names none of them clearly. So the rendering Grundrechtecharta is right, but only with its limited reach and its distinctness from the ECHR understood.
Typical mistakes
- The Charter binds the Member States only when they implement Union law, Art. 51 Abs. 1 GRCh, so reading it as a bill of rights for all national action overstates when it applies.
- It is not the European Convention on Human Rights: the EMRK is a separate Council-of-Europe instrument, so conflating Charter and Convention is wrong.
- It is not the European Social Charter either, so a bare Charta should be resolved to the Grundrechtecharta when the Union Charter is meant.
What matters
Rendering a Union fundamental-rights point, the translation should use Grundrechtecharta for the Charter of Fundamental Rights, note its rank alongside the Treaties, Art. 6 Abs. 1 EUV, and mark that it binds the Member States only when they implement Union law, Art. 51 Abs. 1 GRCh. It should be kept distinct from the EMRK and the Europäische Sozialcharta.
What the machine misses
Machine output may render Charter as a bare Charta or treat it as a general national bill of rights. It loses that the Grundrechtecharta has the rank of the Treaties, Art. 6 Abs. 1 EUV, that under Art. 51 Abs. 1 GRCh it binds the Member States only when they implement Union law, and that it is neither the EMRK nor the Europäische Sozialcharta. The rendering overstates its reach and blurs it with other instruments.
Examples
| the Charter of Fundamental Rights | die Grundrechtecharta |
| within the scope of Union law | im Anwendungsbereich des Unionsrechts |
| a breach of the Charter | ein Verstoß gegen die Grundrechtecharta |
| the Charter and the ECHR | die Grundrechtecharta und die EMRK |