Skip to main content

Finepost · Notes · Law

basic law

noun · Grundgesetz

Grundgesetz is the name of the German constitution, and Basic Law is its official English rendering. It is called Grundgesetz, not Verfassung, for historical reasons, yet its constitutional adjectives run on verfassungs-, so constitutional means verfassungsrechtlich and unconstitutional means verfassungswidrig, not the Grundgesetz stem.

Which translation, when

Grundgesetz statt Verfassungthe name: in 1949 the founders chose Grundgesetz to signal a provisional order pending reunification, Art. 146 GG, rather than a full Verfassung; after 1990 it stayed, and it is in substance the constitution, so the German constitution is das Grundgesetz and Basic Law is the settled English name.
Substantiv gegen Adjektivthe asymmetry that trips translators: the noun is Grundgesetz, but the adjectives and compounds run on verfassungs-, so constitutional law is Verfassungsrecht, the constitutional court is the Verfassungsgericht and unconstitutional is verfassungswidrig, not forms built on Grundgesetz.

Why

Basic Law is Grundgesetz, the proper name of the German constitution, and two things need care. First, the name itself: in 1949 the framers deliberately called it a Grundgesetz rather than a Verfassung, to mark it as a provisional arrangement that should not cement the division of Germany, with a full constitution to be adopted by the whole people after reunification, Art. 146 GG. Reunification came in 1990, the eastern Länder acceded, and the provisional Grundgesetz stayed; in substance it has always been a full constitution. So the German constitution is das Grundgesetz, and Basic Law is its established English name, not a loose paraphrase. Second, the asymmetry between noun and adjective: although the document is the Grundgesetz, the adjectival and compound forms are built on verfassungs-, from Verfassung. Constitutional law is Verfassungsrecht, the constitutional court is the Bundesverfassungsgericht, a constitutional complaint is a Verfassungsbeschwerde, and unconstitutional is verfassungswidrig; the Grundgesetz-based forms are not used for these. So rendering the constitution generically, or building constitutional adjectives on Grundgesetz, misses both the proper name and the settled usage.

Typical mistakes

  • The German constitution has a proper name, das Grundgesetz, rendered in English as the Basic Law, so a generic paraphrase such as grundlegendes Gesetz misses the name.
  • The noun is Grundgesetz but the constitutional adjectives run on verfassungs-, so constitutional is verfassungsrechtlich and unconstitutional verfassungswidrig, not Grundgesetz-based forms.
  • Germans normally call their constitution das Grundgesetz rather than die Verfassung, though it is a constitution in substance, so defaulting to Verfassung as the name reads oddly.

What matters

Referring to the German constitution, the translation should name it das Grundgesetz, render Basic Law as its English equivalent, and keep the constitutional adjectives on verfassungs-, verfassungsrechtlich and verfassungswidrig. A generic phrase for the document, or a Grundgesetz-based adjective, misses the settled usage.

Authority

  1. Art. 146 GG
  2. Art. 79 GG

What the machine misses

Machine output renders basic law sometimes as the proper name Grundgesetz but often as a generic phrase, and then builds constitutional adjectives on the wrong stem. It loses that the German constitution is named das Grundgesetz, that Basic Law is its settled English form, and that the adjectives run on verfassungs-, so constitutional is verfassungsrechtlich and unconstitutional verfassungswidrig. The rendering misses both the name and the usage.

See what the machine does with this clause →

Examples

the Basic Lawdas Grundgesetz
a constitutional complainteine Verfassungsbeschwerde
the provision is unconstitutionaldie Vorschrift ist verfassungswidrig
constitutional lawdas Verfassungsrecht
Checked 24 Jul 2026 finepost.co.uk/notes/basic-law